In the evenings, as we lie supine on the Netflix echo-chamber of our living room couches, it can be difficult to fan away the ghosts of our days\u2019 teaching efforts. We defeat the clinomaniac within us on a daily basis and do our best to engage the mysterious creatures before us only to wander home again wondering how we can do better.<\/p>\n
Who are we teaching? What can we know about this demographic that might help us better engage with them and provide useful guidance in this, as Roland Orzabal put it, \u2018Mad World.\u2019?<\/p>\n
The Gubernatorial World Health Organisation along with some other research bodies have gone to some lengths to help us gain insight into what is occurring in the teenage realm of modern life. Perhaps we can better know these \u2018teenagers\u2019 by taking a languid dip into the data streams and equip ourselves with a more germane empathy.<\/p>\n
An important endeavour then is to re-examine our assumptions about modern teens.\u00a0A recurring topic of public discourse in 2019 centres around the assumption that digital screen time and social media usage leads to a decrease in adolescent well-being. As with many complex issues, this is simply not conclusive and the issue is quite nuanced.<\/p>\n
In a recent\u00a0study<\/a>\u00a0at Oxford by Amy Orben and Andrew K. Przybylski at the Internet Institute,\u00a0<\/strong>there was little evidence found which correlates screen time with lower levels of adolescent well-being. While more data is needed from online companies in order to determine causative factors of specific types of online activity, screen time alone does not seem to be a factor to warrant concern.<\/p>\n Another, all too commonly held belief, is one that\u00a0social media\u00a0<\/em>itself\u00a0<\/em>is to blame for low levels of modern adolescent well being. While there is much to be concerned about, another\u00a0study<\/a>\u00a0conducted in May of 2019 by the Department of Experimental Psychology at Oxford University concluded that:<\/p>\n \u00a0The relations linking social media use and life satisfaction are, therefore, more nuanced than previously assumed: They are inconsistent, possibly contingent on gender, and vary substantially depending on how the data are analysed. Most effects are tiny\u2014arguably trivial; where best statistical practices are followed, they are not statistically significant in more than half of models.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n While the study also suggests that there is much to learn about this issue it is clear that current popular opinion is fuelled more by media hype than robust science.\u00a0So. It might be icky at times, but it is not a given that social media, in and of itself, is the cause of a lack of adolescent well-being. So let\u2019s move on\u2026 (for now).<\/p>\n A\u00a02019 OECD Study<\/a>\u00a0exploring the impacts of technology on the brain, cognition and well-being, also suggests that the quality of research on this topic is not where it needs to be. However, while their findings reinforce those of the aforementioned studies, it raises caution around the potentially negative impact on sleep with regard to before-bed media consumption. The study also recognises the implicit chicken and egg dilemma relevant to this issue:<\/p>\n \u201cDo behavioural tendencies\/problems predict more screen time or does screen time predict behavioural tendencies\/problems?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n The report provides some important balance to the issue and shows that while not all media is created equal, moderate internet use,\u00a0\u201ccan help children build rapport with their peers, and probably does not displace engaging in physical activity or other health-promoting behaviours.\u201d (OECD)<\/em><\/p>\n